🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.